Thievin' barstewards
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
put in for planning on some land
after 3 resubmissions it has been granted on 1 condition
we have to *contribute* 10 grand per house to go towards local schools
I asked what if people with no kids buy them?
what a liberty
do the somalis,poles,bengalis etc etc with 12 kids contribute 10 grand when they turn up?
the boggle minds
no wonder the building game is on its knees
LLL
after 3 resubmissions it has been granted on 1 condition
we have to *contribute* 10 grand per house to go towards local schools
I asked what if people with no kids buy them?
what a liberty
do the somalis,poles,bengalis etc etc with 12 kids contribute 10 grand when they turn up?
the boggle minds
no wonder the building game is on its knees
LLL
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Somerset
- Contact:
And they want to encourage housebuilding?? Ridiculous situation for the trade but all developers are 'subjected' to this Section 106 agreement.
RW Gale Ltd - Civils & Surfacing Contractors based in Somerset
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
-
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 9:58 pm
- Location: Gatwick
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Posts: 2199
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:07 pm
- Location: Surrey
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 4:22 pm
- Location: South of England
It's a liberty, the government are always banging on about house shortages. Section 106 is an absolute farce, allegedly contributing to roads, schools ect... what's the council tax for?
I have heard of developers that steer clear from new builds,the irony is they develop existing properties,doubling the size= more residents/cars ect.. and no contributions to local amenities
If they were to stay in the property; for example 2-4 years,the council tax remains the same ,no capital gains tax when selling ect... What a farce!!
I have heard of developers that steer clear from new builds,the irony is they develop existing properties,doubling the size= more residents/cars ect.. and no contributions to local amenities
If they were to stay in the property; for example 2-4 years,the council tax remains the same ,no capital gains tax when selling ect... What a farce!!
-
- Posts: 2199
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 1:07 pm
- Location: Surrey
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 10:20 pm
- Location: hemel hempstead,herts. 01442 212315
Who is to say that your 10g (LLL) will actually go towards schools
it doesnt. My local steering group are using section 106 money for verge hardening so council tennants can park their cars!
Dan the Crusher Man
01442 212315
www.crusherhire.co.uk
"a satisfied customer? we should have them stuffed!"
01442 212315
www.crusherhire.co.uk
"a satisfied customer? we should have them stuffed!"
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 4:22 pm
- Location: South of England
The governments only solution to date to kick start the building industry and to get Joe public to part with thier hard earned is the changes to permitted development that they are trying to push through.
As most of you guys are aware they have proposed doubling the allocation/size of the ground floor extension. My thoughts as follows;
1.Increased building costs
2. Over development for most properties i.e. will not increase resale value (many people are savy these days). What would you do the with the 3-4 x? additional sq m any way?
3. Really gonna pee off the neighbours, increase to max 6m for an attached property and 8m for a detached. Imaginge living in a terraced house and your neighbour builds a 6m long extension and 3m high. Now imagine living in between 2 houses with the maximum built!
Any one else have any thoughts on this proposed change?
Dave
As most of you guys are aware they have proposed doubling the allocation/size of the ground floor extension. My thoughts as follows;
1.Increased building costs
2. Over development for most properties i.e. will not increase resale value (many people are savy these days). What would you do the with the 3-4 x? additional sq m any way?
3. Really gonna pee off the neighbours, increase to max 6m for an attached property and 8m for a detached. Imaginge living in a terraced house and your neighbour builds a 6m long extension and 3m high. Now imagine living in between 2 houses with the maximum built!
Any one else have any thoughts on this proposed change?
Dave
-
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 9:58 pm
- Location: Gatwick
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: uk