Buywithconfidence.gov.uk
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
i saw this in my local paper today and was dismayed at the scheme,here is an edited copy of the letter i sent them:
Dear Sir/Madam,
I noticed the advert in today's paper, I entered a Luton postcode and was dismayed at the lack of results locally.
There are a lot of schemes like this nationwide but the problems I can see are thus:
We ( L L L building contractors Ltd) have been trading for 25 years, in that time we have never had to go to arbitration and have always treated people fairly, we have completed upwards of 300 extensions,loft conversions, and refurbishments in that time,and happily have had a lot of personal recommendations from it.
We have worked extensively at luton schools, and with social services, and are on luton borough council's approved contractor list.
So in a nutshell, we are the type of reputable company you speak of, so surely the firms on the council's list should be added by default to the list??
Also any scheme that requires payment (however small) denigrates from the value of the scheme,the "bodger the builder " type you so artfully stereotype, will surely sign up for the scheme as an access point to the weak and vulnerable., a wolf in sheep's clothing you might say.
My final point is the £75 job tariff
Is a VAT registered builder going to send an employee,who he has to pay tax and NI contributions for, plus public liability insurance,in a vehicle that must be fully legal to a job say 15miles away,then buy materials (small perhaps) carry out the work, clean up , drive home and charge £75 ??
A much more realistic minimum charge would be up to < £150 + VAT
As someone who works with plasterers,carpenters,painters etc on a daily basis this would be more likely to ensure an efficient and effective job.
I applaud the initiative behind this scheme and wish you all the best with it, but i do have reservations
regards lutonlagerlout.
I cant help thinking that even the CRB checks wont work,joe bloggs will just use his brother's name in scotland or whatever.
plus as i said,exactly what can you do for £75 effectively and make money?
we are a business not a charity,TBH if a job is worth peanuts and we like the people (cuppa tea etc.) then i would rather do it free than charge £75 (and have done in the past)
things like unblocking a loo or cleaning out a back inlet gully that sort of thing
what do you think?
LLL
???
Dear Sir/Madam,
I noticed the advert in today's paper, I entered a Luton postcode and was dismayed at the lack of results locally.
There are a lot of schemes like this nationwide but the problems I can see are thus:
We ( L L L building contractors Ltd) have been trading for 25 years, in that time we have never had to go to arbitration and have always treated people fairly, we have completed upwards of 300 extensions,loft conversions, and refurbishments in that time,and happily have had a lot of personal recommendations from it.
We have worked extensively at luton schools, and with social services, and are on luton borough council's approved contractor list.
So in a nutshell, we are the type of reputable company you speak of, so surely the firms on the council's list should be added by default to the list??
Also any scheme that requires payment (however small) denigrates from the value of the scheme,the "bodger the builder " type you so artfully stereotype, will surely sign up for the scheme as an access point to the weak and vulnerable., a wolf in sheep's clothing you might say.
My final point is the £75 job tariff
Is a VAT registered builder going to send an employee,who he has to pay tax and NI contributions for, plus public liability insurance,in a vehicle that must be fully legal to a job say 15miles away,then buy materials (small perhaps) carry out the work, clean up , drive home and charge £75 ??
A much more realistic minimum charge would be up to < £150 + VAT
As someone who works with plasterers,carpenters,painters etc on a daily basis this would be more likely to ensure an efficient and effective job.
I applaud the initiative behind this scheme and wish you all the best with it, but i do have reservations
regards lutonlagerlout.
I cant help thinking that even the CRB checks wont work,joe bloggs will just use his brother's name in scotland or whatever.
plus as i said,exactly what can you do for £75 effectively and make money?
we are a business not a charity,TBH if a job is worth peanuts and we like the people (cuppa tea etc.) then i would rather do it free than charge £75 (and have done in the past)
things like unblocking a loo or cleaning out a back inlet gully that sort of thing
what do you think?
LLL
???
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact:
There's an ever-growing number of these schemes: trustmark; fair trades; and the rest, but they all suffer from the same basic flaw, which is thorough vetting. They can't vet a company properly for less than around 400 quid, and you can multiply that by 10 for firms with more than 6-8 lads, and so it becomes uneconomic to run properly vetted schemes.
Then you have the problem that a contractor is only as good as the people working for them. You get the good 'uns to the front for the vetting, then when there's a bit of a downturn in business, lay them off and bring in a load of chancers working for beer vouchers, yet the company is still 'approved'.
I honestly don't know what the solution is. I'd like to see VAT removed from all building work, so that the advantage enjoyed by "cash traders" is removed and we're all playing on a level field. That would be a start!
If they can give gazillions of quids to useless bankers, why not remove VAT and give the building trade a bit of a boost?
Then you have the problem that a contractor is only as good as the people working for them. You get the good 'uns to the front for the vetting, then when there's a bit of a downturn in business, lay them off and bring in a load of chancers working for beer vouchers, yet the company is still 'approved'.
I honestly don't know what the solution is. I'd like to see VAT removed from all building work, so that the advantage enjoyed by "cash traders" is removed and we're all playing on a level field. That would be a start!
If they can give gazillions of quids to useless bankers, why not remove VAT and give the building trade a bit of a boost?
Site Agent - Pavingexpert
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:24 pm
- Location: Derbyshire
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4420
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 3:55 pm
- Location: high peak
- Contact:
no vat on new build, or at least that was the last few years we but 13 new houses up on an new estate and no vat on materials.
Giles
Groundworks and Equestrian specialists, prestige new builds and sports pitches. High Peak, Cheshire, South Yorkshire area.
http://www.gbgroundworks.com
Groundworks and Equestrian specialists, prestige new builds and sports pitches. High Peak, Cheshire, South Yorkshire area.
http://www.gbgroundworks.com
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
- Location: Reading
IMO VAT is one of the reasons that keeps much of the building trade in the black economy. It wasn't helped by the scrapping of the marginal corp tax rate for small companies, either, but NO ONE wants to pay VAT. On top of that, I resent being forced to be an unpaid tax collector for the government - they don't even cover the postage cost of the return anymore.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:01 am
- Location: London