Inspection chamber connections - Hoe to connect to an inspection chamber

Foul and surface water, private drains and public sewers, land drains and soakaways, filter drains and any other ways of getting rid of water.
Post Reply
johnlr
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post: # 116804Post johnlr

Can anyone help please? I have contractors who want to run pipes from rainwater downpipes into an inspection chamber that is a combined foul and rainwater drain.
The inspection chamber is a base plus a riser and the contractor wants to put the new pipes coming into the chamber at a level part way up the riser, so cutting a hole in the side of the riser, and then putting the pipes through the hole so that they finish hanging in space above the base of the inspection chamber.
Is this ok to do?
I understand that it saves them having to excavate down to the base of the chamber and finding a spare connection spigot, but is it ok to do?
Thanks
John

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 116805Post lutonlagerlout

no its not!
its a bodge
2 pertinent points

1 why cant they dig a soakaway for rain water?
2 what will stop the little brown furry fellas running up ypour drain pipes and into your roof?


LLL :angry:
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

johnlr
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post: # 116806Post johnlr

wrt the points
1) because the building warrant specifies it into the drains
2) there will be a trap/gulley which presumably would prevent that, and actually having the end of the pipe suspended in mid air would make it more difficult for them to get up the pipe than connecting the pipe into the bottom of the chamber!

Your opinion that it is a bodge is helpful, thanks. Is it actually against any building regs does anyone know?
John

jwill
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:00 pm
Location: leic

Post: # 116810Post jwill

How deep is connection versus going down to an invert

johnlr
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post: # 116811Post johnlr

probably about 1ft rather than 3ft
John

jwill
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:00 pm
Location: leic

Post: # 116826Post jwill

Bit lazy then isn't it. We're not talking metres here

johnlr
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post: # 116829Post johnlr

Yes, I think it's very lazy! But is it against the building regs, does anyone know?
John

Tony McC
Site Admin
Posts: 8346
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
Contact:

Post: # 116850Post Tony McC

Building Regs makes no particular mention of how connections such as this are to be formed, but it defers to the British Standard BS EN 1610:2015 and possible (depending on BCO interpretation) to Sewers For Adoption, both of which require such a connection to be a dropshaft

Occasionally, some BCOs will permite a 'hanging' connection but there have to be extenuating circumstances.
Site Agent - Pavingexpert

johnlr
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:11 pm
Location: Scotland

Post: # 116870Post johnlr

many thanks
John

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 116872Post lutonlagerlout

I had forgotten all about that dropshaft connection we did
fame at last :;):
LLL
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

Post Reply