Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:51 pm
Hello Tony-
Hope you are well. Seems I have a hardscape question with every other garden I design. Surely one day I'll have enough experience and I'll stop bothering you. But for now...
I am designing a raised, circular water feature for a tiny town garden. 1100 would be the maximum diameter, with a height of 500mm above ground and another 100 below ground (fish need a warm place in those winter months).
I originally envisioned building the circular wall in brick, knowing that there are special radial bricks available. Alas, a web search shows that the manufacturers only make them for a radius of 450 (=900 diam -- a bit too small) or 675 (=1350 diam. -- too big). Further, when I actually drew it to scale on paper, I realized that the proportion of water surface was way too small for the wall (225 thick) plus its stone coping with a 20mm overhang. Almost as much wall as water on the horizontal surface! Not so attractive.
Okay, what about a radial stretcher, a single skin? Would it be strong enough to withstand the water pressure? But, still I am limited to the manufacturers smallest size (450 radius), which makes a 900 diam pond.
The best proportion would be an 1100 diam pond, using a wall with a width of 100 mm, then a coping of 140 to 150 width on top. That would leave plenty of water surface showing on top.
Aha! I thought. What about rendered concrete??
Can I make a concrete wall as thin as 100mm? Using reinforcing mesh? Bending the shuttering to such small a circle might be difficult... The whole thing would be 600 height, with 100 below ground.
Have I designed something unbuildable?? (Sigh: I am more confident with plants.) I am open to your suggestions.
Thanks.
--Ladysmantle
Hope you are well. Seems I have a hardscape question with every other garden I design. Surely one day I'll have enough experience and I'll stop bothering you. But for now...
I am designing a raised, circular water feature for a tiny town garden. 1100 would be the maximum diameter, with a height of 500mm above ground and another 100 below ground (fish need a warm place in those winter months).
I originally envisioned building the circular wall in brick, knowing that there are special radial bricks available. Alas, a web search shows that the manufacturers only make them for a radius of 450 (=900 diam -- a bit too small) or 675 (=1350 diam. -- too big). Further, when I actually drew it to scale on paper, I realized that the proportion of water surface was way too small for the wall (225 thick) plus its stone coping with a 20mm overhang. Almost as much wall as water on the horizontal surface! Not so attractive.
Okay, what about a radial stretcher, a single skin? Would it be strong enough to withstand the water pressure? But, still I am limited to the manufacturers smallest size (450 radius), which makes a 900 diam pond.
The best proportion would be an 1100 diam pond, using a wall with a width of 100 mm, then a coping of 140 to 150 width on top. That would leave plenty of water surface showing on top.
Aha! I thought. What about rendered concrete??
Can I make a concrete wall as thin as 100mm? Using reinforcing mesh? Bending the shuttering to such small a circle might be difficult... The whole thing would be 600 height, with 100 below ground.
Have I designed something unbuildable?? (Sigh: I am more confident with plants.) I am open to your suggestions.
Thanks.
--Ladysmantle