Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2004 5:20 pm
I live at the top end of a six house shared drainage system. The household at the bottom of the system has lately been having blockage problems. It has now come to light following a full camera survey of the complete system that the main collapse of the pitch fibre system is on his property underneath his extension. The survey suggests that my section and my neighbours section is suitable for re-lining but the rest of the remaining pipes should be replaced. However the estimate also includes diverting the new pipe around the extension that has caused the main problem and constructing a new man-hole etc.
What I would like advice on is how much should I legally be liable for? and can you explain the mystical standard formula? that is always talked about on shared systems but I can find no examples of the formula anywhere. The estimate is one price for the complete system and is not detailed. The company say that an equal 6 way split of the amount is the best way as if the standard formula was to be used I would be paying the largest amount by far. It seems unfair that I am paying for a problem caused initially by a builders mistake on an extension and then paying again to correct it and not even on my land etc.
(Edited by drivealot at 5:29 pm on Jan. 9, 2004)
What I would like advice on is how much should I legally be liable for? and can you explain the mystical standard formula? that is always talked about on shared systems but I can find no examples of the formula anywhere. The estimate is one price for the complete system and is not detailed. The company say that an equal 6 way split of the amount is the best way as if the standard formula was to be used I would be paying the largest amount by far. It seems unfair that I am paying for a problem caused initially by a builders mistake on an extension and then paying again to correct it and not even on my land etc.
(Edited by drivealot at 5:29 pm on Jan. 9, 2004)