Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:37 pm
by martibab
Hello all
I am a newbie here but I don't think this has been asked before. I am getting conflicting advice on what kind of bed to lay patio slabs on. Most layers are telling me that only a full bed will do. One layer who seems reputable and successful says that he now lays each slab on a circle of mortar with a spot in the middle and presses down onto this. He says that in several years he has had no call-backs using this method, whereas he had several call-backs when he used to lay slabs on a full bed of mortar. He says that his method is more work, but appears more effective for various reasons that I can elaborate if anyone’s interested.
Any helpful comments on this would be much appreciated!
Regards
Brian
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 12:52 pm
by r896neo
This is nonsense and he clearly had a very poor technique if he had problems laying on a full bed.
I'd be interested to hear these reasons why its more effective.
Voids of any kind or size under paving will always create more problems than a solid bed.
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:31 pm
by Westminster Stone
Laying onto a spot bed can cause moisture to come up through the slab where the base ins't, and cause black spots or patches in natural stone products, especially fossil mint which is quite pourus
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:47 pm
by Bob_A
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:30 pm
by local patios and driveway
do NOT listen to that guy. he is successful as he is cheaper because he is bodging his work, but because he is cheaper he is getting the lions share of the work locally. i dont for a second believe his pointing is standing the test of time, the reason he probably dont like a full bed is that he laid them badly and had a few rocking slabs. amateur mistake.
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:18 pm
by lutonlagerlout
berkshire hunt
LLL
Posted: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:26 pm
by local patios and driveway
forgot to ask, i would love to know the reasons he gave
Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 6:46 am
by GB_Groundworks
I'd love to know the bollocks behind how having a non full bed is better than having the entire flag bedded down and in contact.
Not to mention it's not British standard so he is shafted if ever hes called upon to qualify his work in court say
Does he ride a horse?
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 2:32 pm
by martibab
Sorry I’ve only just got around to this. No discourtesy intended.
Thanks for all the very helpful comments, which were mostly - no, entirely - critical of the 'circle and a dab' method proposed by one tradesman. Someone asked what his reasons were for his method. Here they are:
1. He says he had some call backs when he laid a full bed;
2. He’s been called in to deal with someone else’s customer whose slabs on a full bed weren’t adhering well (he was able to lift the edge slabs off);
3. He’s not had a call back in the several years since he’s been doing it by the ‘circle and spot’ method;
4. He says that slabs adhere better with his method than on a full bed;
5. He says that pressing the slabs down when he levels them fills the voids underneath.
Is that all nonsense, or does he have some points?
Thanks again.
Brian
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 3:43 pm
by bodgeitandscarper
Oh Brian!
Its all bollocks!
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 4:45 pm
by London Stone Paving
Maybe this guys a friend of the sherrif :;):
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 6:08 pm
by lutonlagerlout
he is talking rubbish
LLL
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 10:53 am
by ringi
One thought….
How big does the spot in the circle have to be before it becomes a full bed when the slab is pressed down?
If the circle and spot are big enough if this much different from making ridges in a full bed?
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 11:36 am
by lutonlagerlout
When I lay a flag or slab I get the full bed to the correct level and then furrow it,as the flag as then tapped down to finished height this ensues a full bed
What he is suggesting is total bolocks
LLL
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 11:54 am
by Carberry
martibab wrote:Sorry I’ve only just got around to this. No discourtesy intended.
Thanks for all the very helpful comments, which were mostly - no, entirely - critical of the 'circle and a dab' method proposed by one tradesman. Someone asked what his reasons were for his method. Here they are:
1. He says he had some call backs when he laid a full bed;
2. He’s been called in to deal with someone else’s customer whose slabs on a full bed weren’t adhering well (he was able to lift the edge slabs off);
3. He’s not had a call back in the several years since he’s been doing it by the ‘circle and spot’ method;
4. He says that slabs adhere better with his method than on a full bed;
5. He says that pressing the slabs down when he levels them fills the voids underneath.
Is that all nonsense, or does he have some points?
Thanks again.
Brian
1. Probably because he laid them wrong, he obviously doesn't know what he is talking about.
2. Whoever laid them didn't use any SBR in the mix or wiggle / tap them down. Edge slabs are always the most susceptible to movement so should be laid on full concrete bed with haunching and SBR.
3. He won't get a call back in a few years, later on his patios will all fail though whether they end up with water freezing in the gaps, vermin there, rocking flags etc Bottom line is that it doesn't conform to british standards which states bedding layer should "provide uniform support"
4. Will adhere better if laid correctly on a full bed than on a spot bed, in any case if you want them to adhere best you use a wetter mix with SBR in it and or SBR bond bridge.
5. There will still be plenty of voids underneath. The only way to ensure that there aren't any is to put huge circles but when you tap it down you end up with mortar squelching up between the joints and making a mess of the face and having a hell of a time tapping it down to level because there is too much mortar underneath.
In short, he is talking bollocks.