Page 1 of 1
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 10:04 pm
by DNgroundworks
Hi all, Just wondering is there any reason apart from possibly handling issues why people would lay 600x600 on a driveway instead of the bigger 600x900?
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 12:29 am
by lutonlagerlout
aesthetics?
LLL
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:11 pm
by meany
A customer wanted 900x600 laying,i out priced myself for the job because i was thinking about my testicles being attached. :p
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 5:42 pm
by DNgroundworks
A customer wants 600 x 900 laying on there drive, but when looking at other drives across the road there layed with 600x600, is there any particular reason for this?
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 5:47 pm
by msh paving
I can't see any reason why you cant use 600x900, as long as you lay them on a concrete bed,
last time I did a large area I screeded out semi-dry concrete and laid them straight on it they are still there to this day
MSH