Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:26 am
Gentleman,
I have a dilemma. PLEASE help.
I have spent a considerable amount of time looking through the pages on the site, in particular, screeding and related pages. I am not sure if I know the answer to my own question, or not. With everything renovation or building, generally speaking, if there is a harder way to do something, I will do it, in the interests of getting a better quality, or better looking, job. But I am looking to make a compromise on paving and I am not sure if it is only a compromise or a silly mistake that I will regret.
Here is my situation.
I have been building a storage area underneath my house, around 5 metres x 8 metres, and only a bit over 1 metre (4 feet) high. So no standing. It is only accessible through the lounge room. I have spent some time levelling, rendering, and painting, and now plan to lay some cement pavers, 450x450x50.
Here are some pics of the area: http://wagnon.net/pavers/index.html
The house is old, and the entire suburb in Australia is a sand pit, 2 or 3 miles from the beach. So the sand is course, I believe (ie as compared to building sand).
My issue is that I am loathed to remove the sand that is down there, put a base down, and then replace it with new sand. As I say, there is already sand there, and it is only accessible via the lounge room. There are also a number of other special circumstances, as compared to most paving situations I believe.
The area is technically "inside" and so will never be exposed to rain.
You can't stand up (as I say it's less than 4 feet), moving around is on hands and knees, and so there will never be a lot of traffic down there.
It is impractical (and I not sure even if it would be possible) to get a compacter down there.
Laying the pavers is going to be physically demanding. So I want to get this right. I have asked one contractor to look at it, but he walked away.
My compromise is that I am considering screeding off the sand that is there, and laying the pavers. I have a very good laser level and with the advice so generously provided here on this site, I believe I can do a good job. But that means no sub-base, or aggregate underneath the sand, which I think is in greater depth (to hard compacted sand) in some places than others. But the outer walls will certainly prevent any "spreading".
It really is a hard thing to advise on, I suppose, unless you see it. But I am not sure.
This is a long request. Sorry. Any response, however short, will be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Nic
PS. As an aside, the only other issue I have is whether my circumstances would suggest an obvious answer as to whether to use a cement based grout, or a treated pointing sand, or something like romex. The pros and cons of this are well discussed on the site, but then this is mainly considered in "external" applications I believe. I suppose in the back on my mind I'm worried that a paver will sink somewhere, and the non-cement based solution will be easier to remove if I have to lift some pavers. (I just can't see the pavers sinking. They are so solid and heavy.)
PPS. Regarding the site: what an extraordinary achievement this communication is. Voluminous knowledge, imparted with such detail and sophistication, is wondrously inspiring. I am sure it has made a positive impact on the quality of paving work worldwide. I don't just mean in terms of DIY, but with enabling "clients" to ask better questions, or be better specifiers perhaps, thereby motivating paving professionals to do better work (or stopping them cutting corners!). Hearty congratulations to you. One last point. I am sure you have considered and rejected the notion, but I would be very happy to see some Google AdSence ads on the pages. I wouldn't compromises the entity of the communication at all, I don't think.
I have a dilemma. PLEASE help.
I have spent a considerable amount of time looking through the pages on the site, in particular, screeding and related pages. I am not sure if I know the answer to my own question, or not. With everything renovation or building, generally speaking, if there is a harder way to do something, I will do it, in the interests of getting a better quality, or better looking, job. But I am looking to make a compromise on paving and I am not sure if it is only a compromise or a silly mistake that I will regret.
Here is my situation.
I have been building a storage area underneath my house, around 5 metres x 8 metres, and only a bit over 1 metre (4 feet) high. So no standing. It is only accessible through the lounge room. I have spent some time levelling, rendering, and painting, and now plan to lay some cement pavers, 450x450x50.
Here are some pics of the area: http://wagnon.net/pavers/index.html
The house is old, and the entire suburb in Australia is a sand pit, 2 or 3 miles from the beach. So the sand is course, I believe (ie as compared to building sand).
My issue is that I am loathed to remove the sand that is down there, put a base down, and then replace it with new sand. As I say, there is already sand there, and it is only accessible via the lounge room. There are also a number of other special circumstances, as compared to most paving situations I believe.
The area is technically "inside" and so will never be exposed to rain.
You can't stand up (as I say it's less than 4 feet), moving around is on hands and knees, and so there will never be a lot of traffic down there.
It is impractical (and I not sure even if it would be possible) to get a compacter down there.
Laying the pavers is going to be physically demanding. So I want to get this right. I have asked one contractor to look at it, but he walked away.
My compromise is that I am considering screeding off the sand that is there, and laying the pavers. I have a very good laser level and with the advice so generously provided here on this site, I believe I can do a good job. But that means no sub-base, or aggregate underneath the sand, which I think is in greater depth (to hard compacted sand) in some places than others. But the outer walls will certainly prevent any "spreading".
It really is a hard thing to advise on, I suppose, unless you see it. But I am not sure.
This is a long request. Sorry. Any response, however short, will be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Nic
PS. As an aside, the only other issue I have is whether my circumstances would suggest an obvious answer as to whether to use a cement based grout, or a treated pointing sand, or something like romex. The pros and cons of this are well discussed on the site, but then this is mainly considered in "external" applications I believe. I suppose in the back on my mind I'm worried that a paver will sink somewhere, and the non-cement based solution will be easier to remove if I have to lift some pavers. (I just can't see the pavers sinking. They are so solid and heavy.)
PPS. Regarding the site: what an extraordinary achievement this communication is. Voluminous knowledge, imparted with such detail and sophistication, is wondrously inspiring. I am sure it has made a positive impact on the quality of paving work worldwide. I don't just mean in terms of DIY, but with enabling "clients" to ask better questions, or be better specifiers perhaps, thereby motivating paving professionals to do better work (or stopping them cutting corners!). Hearty congratulations to you. One last point. I am sure you have considered and rejected the notion, but I would be very happy to see some Google AdSence ads on the pages. I wouldn't compromises the entity of the communication at all, I don't think.