Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:51 pm
I have some very pale Indian Sandstone, not dissimilar to Stonemarket Mirage. Given the absorbent nature of this pale stone I am thinking about sealing it prior to contractor - hi Dan - laying it.
Manufacturers such as Lithofin and Hagesan, recommend sealing prior to laying, to avoid dirt absorbing whilst doing the job. However, the consensus amongst contractors is to lay, and leave it till Spring, and seal when dry.
HG Hagesan Natural Stone Impregnator states that dampness in the stone can still evaporate and on this basis their technical department believe that efflorescence won't be a problem. Lithofin are insistent that laying now unsealed is a bad idea as the weather won't be warm enough till Spring and the stone may become stained before then.
What do you think?
Manufacturers such as Lithofin and Hagesan, recommend sealing prior to laying, to avoid dirt absorbing whilst doing the job. However, the consensus amongst contractors is to lay, and leave it till Spring, and seal when dry.
HG Hagesan Natural Stone Impregnator states that dampness in the stone can still evaporate and on this basis their technical department believe that efflorescence won't be a problem. Lithofin are insistent that laying now unsealed is a bad idea as the weather won't be warm enough till Spring and the stone may become stained before then.
What do you think?