How much of a slope?

Patio flagstones (slabs), concrete flags, stone flags including yorkstone and imported flagstones.
Post Reply
newbuyer17
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: MIdlands

Post: # 27874Post newbuyer17

I'm laying out a patio and am unsure how much of a slope I should give the flag stones?
On the setout page it implies 1:80 for block paving, but 1:60 for tarmac?

What would it be for a flagstone patio where I'd like it as level as possible for tables etc but still want it to drain. 1:60 sounds quite a lot to me, but maybe it wouldn't be noticeable.

Thanks

Tony McC
Site Admin
Posts: 8346
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
Contact:

Post: # 27881Post Tony McC

Depends on the flagstones, but 1:60 is a good minimum figure.
Site Agent - Pavingexpert

newbuyer17
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: MIdlands

Post: # 27894Post newbuyer17

Its looking like its going to be these.

http://www.stonemarket.co.uk/yorkstone/yorkstone-riven-paving

So I should maybe go steeper than 1:60? I'm happy to do what is best without the slope being too noticable.

Thanks
P.S. Any comments on the choice of slabs - are these OK?

Rich H
Posts: 884
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
Location: Reading

Post: # 27897Post Rich H

Technically they're fine. Aesthetically it's your choice. Given the minimal price difference, there are very few moulded varieties that I would choose over natural stone, and this isn't one of them. But, like I said, it's a subjective choice. You don't need to be steeper than 1:60 with them, at least.

newbuyer17
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: MIdlands

Post: # 27905Post newbuyer17

Cheers. The more I think about it though the more 1:60 seems a lot. It'd mean a dining table being 2cm lower at one end. Is it not really noticable in practice?

As for the slabs, I'm doing patio on a budget. Therefore these slabs are already better than the peak ones I'd originally planned on getting. Plus, as a first time attempt they should hopefully be easier to lay with common thickness.

Cheers

Rich H
Posts: 884
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
Location: Reading

Post: # 27908Post Rich H

1:60 isn't a lot and won't be noticeable. The important thing is to avoid water holding up on the paving. The greater the 'texture', the greater the gradient required. If you lay them to a lesser fall, the water will still drain off enough that there isn't puddling (if you are careful with the laying) but it will mean that algae and moss can take hold more easily, requiring more maintenance and increasing slip risk.

Tony McC
Site Admin
Posts: 8346
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
Contact:

Post: # 27920Post Tony McC

No matter how much you've thought about it, Newbuyer, those in the trade have been thinking about it a helluva lot longer and 1:60 is widely accepted as a reasonable minimal fall for a patio. If you choose to lay to a flatter fall, don't whinge to us when it ponds!
Site Agent - Pavingexpert

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 27935Post lutonlagerlout

those green patios you see?

they are the ones that ppl thought best to lay level

on a 1200 level its only 20mm of fall to attain 1:60

so a 4.8 m patio has 20 times 4 = 80 mm of fall or 3 inches in old money

totally unnoticeable

LLL
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

newbuyer17
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: MIdlands

Post: # 27952Post newbuyer17

OK, thanks guys. Just checking as it seemed a lot to me, but as you say you are the experience professionals so I'm happy to follow your advice.

Thanks

Post Reply