Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:33 pm
Hi,
I found this site this morning and have been wasting hours of my employers time getting to grips with the basics of laying a patio - fantastic site!!!
Anyways, my query... Ive got a new build house thats built on former contaminated land. The back garden resembles a ploughed field at the moment and the site manager has told me that (due to the former contamination) the top soil is about 1.5m deep throughout.
Im looking to build a 3m x 12m patio, and will probably use a Marshalls Riven slab (I was previously considering Indian Sandstone but what Ive read on this site has put me off a bit).
The advice seems to be that for a standard patio on normal firm ground no sub-base is required, but as I am laying onto pretty unstable topsoil I was wondering if I would be better to plan for the sub-base? Or would a sand/cement layer beaten with a whacker still be sufficient?
Any advice gratefully received.
Dougie
I found this site this morning and have been wasting hours of my employers time getting to grips with the basics of laying a patio - fantastic site!!!
Anyways, my query... Ive got a new build house thats built on former contaminated land. The back garden resembles a ploughed field at the moment and the site manager has told me that (due to the former contamination) the top soil is about 1.5m deep throughout.
Im looking to build a 3m x 12m patio, and will probably use a Marshalls Riven slab (I was previously considering Indian Sandstone but what Ive read on this site has put me off a bit).
The advice seems to be that for a standard patio on normal firm ground no sub-base is required, but as I am laying onto pretty unstable topsoil I was wondering if I would be better to plan for the sub-base? Or would a sand/cement layer beaten with a whacker still be sufficient?
Any advice gratefully received.
Dougie