Page 1 of 1

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:32 pm
by tommo1
hi all,

having my drive paved at the moment, was stoned up
a couple of weeks ago, planning to have blocks laid next
month, the person doing it is a friend of the family and he,s
planning to lay the 50mm blocks on lime stone dust,
he reckons the dust will be a lot better than grit sand,?
my van will using the drive mainly, with quite a bit of weight in, what do you guys recommend ?? thanks....

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:56 pm
by msh paving
I wouldd suggest its a no to using it as a laying couse because it will compact to hard to screed and not be flxable enough,
Sharp sand laid 40mm finished screed thickness on a 150mm thck type1 sub base is what you need MSH :)

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:29 pm
by r896neo
Stone dust is a disaster to lay on as it holds water really badly making it very unstable

Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:34 pm
by Tony McC
Noooooh! Not limestone dust. The man's a fool!

It's too fine; it will bind; it isn't sufficiently free-draining.

Time and time again I say the same thing: there are very, VERY good reasons why the standrads require a specific sand/grit for use as a laying course. All these eejits who reckon they have summat better, that adding cement improves the perfomance, that omitting the sand altogether prevents rutting, they are deluded. If *any* of these screwball suggestions had any validity whatsoever, we'd be using them. They don't, so we don't!