Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2015 4:10 pm
So, i am just finishing laying a small driveway 45m of reclaimed granite setts. I had originally planned to use larsen fjm which is basically the same as flowpoint.
Having laid the setts I now feel they would look better with a little more show by having the pointing sitting 10mm below the surface. This is not easy to acheive with the fjm because it goes off so quick.
I am considering using a normal Mortar slurry as i feel more confident having time to work it. I have pointed a few times using a standard slurry mortar but wondered if anyone had ever tried a surface retarder as you would with exposed agg concrete.
My concern is that the copious amounts of water needed to clean the lot will leave a soft top to the joint as i wash the cement out.
So hence the retarder thought. I could spread the slurry and then spray the whole surface with retarder and hose off the next day.
Opinions? Cheers
Having laid the setts I now feel they would look better with a little more show by having the pointing sitting 10mm below the surface. This is not easy to acheive with the fjm because it goes off so quick.
I am considering using a normal Mortar slurry as i feel more confident having time to work it. I have pointed a few times using a standard slurry mortar but wondered if anyone had ever tried a surface retarder as you would with exposed agg concrete.
My concern is that the copious amounts of water needed to clean the lot will leave a soft top to the joint as i wash the cement out.
So hence the retarder thought. I could spread the slurry and then spray the whole surface with retarder and hose off the next day.
Opinions? Cheers