Interim restraint for block paving - Interim restraint

All forms of block paving, brick paving, flexible or rigid, concrete or clays, new construction or renovation
Post Reply
TDCivils
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:12 pm
Location: Forest Row, East Sussex

Post: # 26438Post TDCivils

I am designing several block paved private access and parking areas. Apart from cars these will be trafficked by the occassional heavy goods and refuse collection vehicles. No problem with specifying the construction make-up itself however two questions regarding restraint of the blocks:

Some of the areas span up to 20-30m in both directions. Where the gradient/cross-fall is constant (1in30 approx) should an interim restraint such as a bed and haunched concrete channel block on edge with its upper face flush with the surface be provided perpendicular to the fall?

In some instances there is a fairly abrupt change in cross-fall gradient between carriageway and parking bay (1in30 to 1in15) should a restraint similar to the above be provided at the gradient change?
DesignersInc

Tony McC
Site Admin
Posts: 8346
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
Contact:

Post: # 26464Post Tony McC

I'd prefer to see the site layout plan, but in most cases, I'm a firm believer in the use of intermediate restraining courses (IRC) on any CB pavement with dimensions in excess of 15m. and even more so when there's a gradient involved, and even more even more so when there's heavy traffic on that gradient.

The IRC doesn't need to be a channel: it can be a matching block, or just a contrasting band course, whatever suits the site. The key thing is to limit spread/creep of the blocks, and more importantly (for me) the laying course material.
Site Agent - Pavingexpert

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 26471Post lutonlagerlout

we are doing a drive at the minute and due to various falls on the existing paths and stuff its a bit off a pain,
but i think the band course bedded in concrete is a good idea as i hate to see BP in different planes,it looks pants rolling this way and that
much better to delineate it
LLL
LLL :)
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

TDCivils
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 4:12 pm
Location: Forest Row, East Sussex

Post: # 26536Post TDCivils

Tony McC wrote:I'd prefer to see the site layout plan, but in most cases, I'm a firm believer in the use of intermediate restraining courses (IRC) on any CB pavement with dimensions in excess of 15m. and even more so when there's a gradient involved, and even more even more so when there's heavy traffic on that gradient.

The IRC doesn't need to be a channel: it can be a matching block, or just a contrasting band course, whatever suits the site. The key thing is to limit spread/creep of the blocks, and more importantly (for me) the laying course material.
Thanks that's very useful.

One further point. If the IRC is a matching block how would it be fixed in place? It could be bedded on concrete but not haunched at the sides if surrounded by other blocks. Would the bedding alone restrain the block sufficiently?
DesignersInc

Tony McC
Site Admin
Posts: 8346
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
Contact:

Post: # 26549Post Tony McC

Use a deeper block, is one solution amongst many.

Image
Site Agent - Pavingexpert

Post Reply