Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:16 am
by lutonlagerlout
just saw the result
fair play Andy Murray,you are british now fella
pls go and get a haircut
LLL 
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:28 am
by henpecked
First since Fred Perry. 
I like him when he's a winning Brit rather than a losing Scot :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:41 pm
by Pablo
aye I seen to remember a recent post where i said he'd never win a major I'm happy that i was wrong he's still a tit who needs a personality transplant though. The tournament seems to be the least important and he had some lucky draws i doubt it's a new era of dominance that the news is touting. Winning the French open or wimbledon will be his true making.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:57 pm
by lutonlagerlout
thats harsh pablo
its a major
as good as it gets tennis wise
as for luck,what about the lucky draws federer,nadal and djokavic have had in the past?
he done the biz,shite haircut and all
LLL
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:12 pm
by rab1
i`m with paul on this one tony. he needs to win on the main stage not the side events.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:22 pm
by lutonlagerlout
eh?
the us open is a main event
tennis majors
what do you want him to do ,win it hopping on 1 leg whilst whistling auld lang syne?
i am no murray fan but he has won a major in a highly competitive era
i wonder if craig levein regrets his words before saturdays showing against serbia?
LLL :;):
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:40 pm
by rab1
wimbeldon or the french open, thats what i mean by a major. the big two of tennis and until he does i dont think he`ll be happy either. craig lavine is an arse
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:30 pm
by bobbi o
He had some good support it has to be said.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:50 pm
by Carberry
There is no big 2 of tennis, it's big 4. Wimbledon, US, French, Australian.
The reason why people write him off until he wins Wimbledon or French open is because Roger Federer is nigh on unbeatable at Wimbledon and Rafa Nadal is unbeatable at Roland Garros
He beat djokovic who is no slouch, he won 3/4 titles last year, set a world record for prize money won in a single season, won record breaking 5 ATP world tour masters 1000 titles. He is great on the hard court (3 wins in australia, 1 at US)
He is competing in an era against 2 all time greats. Any other time he would have been very successful. I think he is a miserable tw*t with no personality and a crap haircut but credit where credit is due, he did well winning this tournament and hopefully it is just the start.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:21 pm
by Mikey_C
He'll never win Wimbledon, and he needs a haircut!
These facts will never change!
I'll my bet my house and all its contents on it!
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:21 pm
by bobbi o
He's only in his twenties,ok worth about 50 mil,but if he's got the dour Scot in his dna,theres no point in trying to be someone your not,just to keep the media happy. 007 and Fergie dont often come across as a bag of laughs,but you wouldnt mind having a pint with them.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:37 pm
by rab1
french open or wimbledon, until then i don't think he will be happy.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:06 pm
by Carberry
Just looked up his networth... he has got to be one of the richest losers in history :p
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:31 pm
by bobbi o
Carberry wrote:Just looked up his networth... he has got to be one of the richest losers in history.
Have you been asleep the last month? or dont you like him cos he's a hibee?
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:55 pm
by Carberry
bobbi o wrote:Carberry wrote:Just looked up his networth... he has got to be one of the richest losers in history.
Have you been asleep the last month? or dont you like him cos he's a hibee?
haha, neither. I don't know him at all, I just know he doesn't come across well in interviews.
Don't care about football. Figured he had some money, had no idea it was £24 million (as of april 2012 according to first link in google). Same old story with Scottish people in sport, gallant losers. Edited my above post to show that it was tongue in cheek.