Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:29 am
The Brew Cabin
Paving, Drainage and Hard-landscaping in Britain and Ireland
https://ext.pavingexpert.com/brewcabin/
Lance armstrong - First i'd ever heard
https://ext.pavingexpert.com/brewcabin/viewtopic.php?t=10742
Page 2 of 5
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:01 pm
my mate has won mr scotland ect for body building and you could not compete in that sport without drugs but they turn a blind eye to it.
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:46 pm
track and field gilesGB_Groundworks wrote:Most our cycling track golds set new world records
LLL :;):
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:43 pm
i thought pablo was referring to cycling as most his post was about cycling hehe
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:04 am
ram them full of the stuff i wanna see a 100m in 4 seconds ...bit like a benny hill clip if you know what i mean
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:43 am
haggistini wrote:ram them full of the stuff i wanna see a 100m in 4 seconds ...bit like a benny hill clip if you know what i mean
Make it just like a benny hill clip, minus benny hill ie: nice women with huge cans running about in their underwear.
Make rollercoasting in your underwear an olympic sport too
http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3DMX6QBOcSur0
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:58 pm
New York times article
Have a look at the image at top of this article. Shows the top 10 from tour de france from last 14 years and which of them have been caught for doping.
Also heard this joke today.... Finally achieved my lifelong goal of having as many tour de france titles as Lance Armstrong
Have a look at the image at top of this article. Shows the top 10 from tour de france from last 14 years and which of them have been caught for doping.
Also heard this joke today.... Finally achieved my lifelong goal of having as many tour de france titles as Lance Armstrong
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:08 am
Lance Armstrong tweeted this image :laugh:
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 7:22 am
TBH stewart he doesnt look too fussed does he?
all the so called evidence against him is testimony by 1 big firm of grasses,all of them pointing at him whilst admitting doping themselves
we have seen in this country that supergrass evidence is often unreliable
I am not defending him but without 1 shred of physical evidence its a hard call
LLL
all the so called evidence against him is testimony by 1 big firm of grasses,all of them pointing at him whilst admitting doping themselves
we have seen in this country that supergrass evidence is often unreliable
I am not defending him but without 1 shred of physical evidence its a hard call
LLL
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:41 pm
maybe you think taking ''acceptable social'' drugs a bit of a larf and harmless. But will you still think that when, because of hero worship, your children and grandchildren will be snorting, skin popping and mainloning? The likes of him should be banned and title stripped to show it doen't pay in the long run. If i tested positive at my job, i'd be goonered straight away, so why not so called 'heros'. Now there's a word that's wasted on sports persons.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:40 am
sorry,are you talking to me sean?
we arent talking about social/anti-social drug taking
we are talking about doping in sport
my point is they have stripped and banned him already, to all extents and purposes he is a doper ,but there is not 1 shred of physical evidence
just all his old team mates grassed him up to save their own skins
doper he may be,but he has raised 500mill for charity
it just goes to show no-one is black or white in real life
just shades of grey
LLL
we arent talking about social/anti-social drug taking
we are talking about doping in sport
my point is they have stripped and banned him already, to all extents and purposes he is a doper ,but there is not 1 shred of physical evidence
just all his old team mates grassed him up to save their own skins
doper he may be,but he has raised 500mill for charity
it just goes to show no-one is black or white in real life
just shades of grey
LLL
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:25 am
It was certainly a witch hunt. Somebody wanted to take him down.
I think it's refreshing to see that somebody so high profile has been brought to account. How often do we hear about people in high positions (in all walks of life) being able to avoid punishment because of "who they are". Even though It's quite clear that the majority of professional cyclists are on drugs, it does not make it right. Of all the cyclist drug cheats, Armstrong was the king. He was the best at cheating and he profiteered the most from cheating, quite right that he should now face some consequences.
He has raised millions for charity but surely there is a principle at stake here.
I think it's refreshing to see that somebody so high profile has been brought to account. How often do we hear about people in high positions (in all walks of life) being able to avoid punishment because of "who they are". Even though It's quite clear that the majority of professional cyclists are on drugs, it does not make it right. Of all the cyclist drug cheats, Armstrong was the king. He was the best at cheating and he profiteered the most from cheating, quite right that he should now face some consequences.
He has raised millions for charity but surely there is a principle at stake here.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:28 am
so you would forgive jimmy saville to then on the basis? he raised millions for charity ??? I have done lots for charidy, swimming, cycling, running, sha'......strike that last one :;): but they did'nt let me keep the money from the mailbag and still gave me holidays at the queens guest house. He is a bad role model for the younger generation, so strip hom naked of all his trophies and any prize , or advert money
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:35 am
seanandruby wrote:so you would forgive jimmy saville to then on the basis? he raised millions for charity ??? I have done lots for charidy, swimming, cycling, running, sha'......strike that last one :;): but they did'nt let me keep the money from the mailbag and still gave me holidays at the queens guest house. He is a bad role model for the younger generation, so strip hom naked of all his trophies and any prize , or advert money
Big difference between those 2. Jimmy Saville destroyed the lives and innocence of hundreds of children. Lance Armstrong was Blood doping which for the most part is harmless. If it was going to affect anyone it was only himself.
LLL: Don't think he gives a sh*t. He has made his fortune, he knows he won those 7 titles and is the 2nd greatest cyclist in history and nothing is going to change that.
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:45 pm
no diffeerence blood dopping, taking illegal substances puts it into kids heads that it's ok to cheat, take drugs etc: it's still doing shit you should'nt do in the public eye, or in private either. No lll i did'nt just mean you, it's a/debate that involved all in the brew cabin not just the bosses