Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:02 pm
by lutonlagerlout
It looks like she may have drowned in the bath
it is rarely the drug that kills junkies,its the chaotic lifestyle
uppers downers booze etc etc
LLL 
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:55 pm
by Carberry
lutonlagerlout wrote:i do indeed sean and on a different day i would find it funny, all about set and setting
and sorry stewart for spelling your name wrong,i have been emailing a client called stuart this week
LLL
I don't mind :laugh:
Could be worse, my friend's name is spelt Steuart. I don't think anyone gets his right.
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:43 pm
by Pablo
On a lighter note not to many folk were sad to see this pop star die.
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:04 pm
by local patios and driveway
Getting sick of hearing houstons songs on the radio all day...
Just hope timmy mallet doesn't die any time soon
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:42 pm
by mickg
ha ha that's an old one pablo but still funny 
>>>>Getting sick of hearing houstons songs on the radio all day...
well turn it off then and get some work done, we are all waiting to see photos of your latest driveway creations :;):
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:16 pm
by seanandruby
it's about time they started drug testing artists before a gig, if they fail then ban them from everywhere. Why should they be treated any different from joe bloggs on a building site. Artists, footballers, members of parliament in fact anyone that is in the public eye should be random tested. I never used to think that people in the public eye caused kids to drink take drugs etc: but now the jury is out
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:20 pm
by Carberry
seanandruby wrote:it's about time they started drug testing artists before a gig, if they fail then ban them from everywhere. Why should they be treated any different from joe bloggs on a building site. Artists, footballers, members of parliament in fact anyone that is in the public eye should be random tested. I never used to think that people in the public eye caused kids to drink take drugs etc: but now the jury is out
A lot of music, art, poetry and any other creative venture came about because of drug use. Even major scientific discoveries.
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:23 pm
by lutonlagerlout
Pablo wrote:On a lighter note not to many folk were sad to see this pop star die.
you have lost me there pablo?
on a lighter note i hear bobbi brown tried to top himself today
he left a note saying " two can play that game"
LLL
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 9:28 pm
by Carberry
lutonlagerlout wrote:Pablo wrote:On a lighter note not to many folk were sad to see this pop star die.
you have lost me there pablo?
on a lighter note i hear bobbi brown tried to top himself today
he left a note saying " two can play that game"
LLL
H, the gay one in steps.
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:07 pm
by seanandruby
Carberry wrote:seanandruby wrote:it's about time they started drug testing artists before a gig, if they fail then ban them from everywhere. Why should they be treated any different from joe bloggs on a building site. Artists, footballers, members of parliament in fact anyone that is in the public eye should be random tested. I never used to think that people in the public eye caused kids to drink take drugs etc: but now the jury is out
A lot of music, art, poetry and any other creative venture came about because of drug use. Even major scientific discoveries.
and a lot of murders, rapes, car accidents/murder, kiddy fiddling ( see gary glitter ) suicides. We need good role models to encourage good behaviour from our kids
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:24 pm
by local patios and driveway
seanandruby wrote:it's about time they started drug testing artists before a gig, if they fail then ban them from everywhere. Why should they be treated any different from joe bloggs on a building site. Artists, footballers, members of parliament in fact anyone that is in the public eye should be random tested. I never used to think that people in the public eye caused kids to drink take drugs etc: but now the jury is out
I agree sean. What example are these people setting?
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:43 pm
by lutonlagerlout
just for a bit of balance,who gave anyone the right to tell other people what to do?
if its my body and i am not hurting anyone then what business is it of yours
drinking is probably the most dangerous drug around and yet it is perfectly legal and acceptable
same with smoking
both are highly addictive as we all know
my daughter's role models are her parents
its up to us to step up to the plate
most wasters i know had some kind of jermey kyle style home life
who wants to live to 100 lying in bed all the time,getting your arse wiped for you and eating cold sludge through a straw?
whitney was a junkhound but AFAIK never claimed to be a role model
LLL
(devil's advocate :;): )
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:19 am
by Carberry
As long as they're not harming anyone I don't see any problem with it. Good things have come from drugs, many inventors and scientists have been inspired whilst on LSD etc. The beatles had to have been high whilst writing most of their music. As LLL says, alcohol is far more dangerous but it is socially acceptable for some reason.
The problem is when morons take them, they don't know what they're taking, they don't know what they're getting in to. I don't think anyone takes heroin or crack and thinks this will be great, I'll become a junkie, steal from everyone, alienate my family, go to prison and rot. They probably think they can handle it.
As for role models, does anyone seriously look at amy whinehouse, pete doherty, post crack whitney etc and go.. I want to be like that. I want to be a f*cking zombie.
Bill Hicks - a positive drug story