Site investigation for driveway
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:32 am
- Location: Manchester
Good afternoon all, I'm building a new gravel driveway approx 40m long by 3.5m wide, would there be a requirement for any Site investigation to determine CBR's etc or would you use a rule of thumb depth for the sub-base (type 1?) of say 200mm topped with 50-75mm of 20mm limestone chippings. Or would you recommend that CBR's be undertaken by the Contractor to determine the sub-base depth? Am slightly worried that we could specify 150mm of type 1 and then the thing starts to rut once it gets trafficked. I know for standard local authority roads they normally specify minimum overall depth of 450mm for frost susceptibility, and typically 150mm sub-base on 450mm capping then black on top. For a private driveway (6 cars using it) 150mm type 1 sub-base with 50mm chippings just seems a little thin to go straight onto the excavated soil. Thanks.
Based in Manchester
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:28 pm
- Location: Preston, Lancashire
For a start you wouldnt build straight onto excavated soil, you want to be building of good stable ground ie: clay, rock, chalk etc
If you dig down 200mm and hit hard clay, terram with 150mm MOT Type 1 put down in two layers and rolled, with 50mm of chippings will be solid i reckon.
The reason the public highways are 450mm deep in construction is because they have to handle the rigor of having 40t artic's, farmer giles in his fastrac, and a constant drone of traffic every day, your driveway isn't getting anywhere near this sort of treatment.
If you dig down 200mm and hit hard clay, terram with 150mm MOT Type 1 put down in two layers and rolled, with 50mm of chippings will be solid i reckon.
The reason the public highways are 450mm deep in construction is because they have to handle the rigor of having 40t artic's, farmer giles in his fastrac, and a constant drone of traffic every day, your driveway isn't getting anywhere near this sort of treatment.
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:28 pm
- Location: Preston, Lancashire
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:28 pm
- Location: Preston, Lancashire
We have just put a haul road in to take 5 "timber carrying" artics a day, for 6 months, that was 250/300 thick crush with terram, on hard (ish) clay it hasnt moved at all, ill probs be somewhere near saying that these lorrys will weigh 40t
Your looking at half that depth of stone...150mm will be enough to take the movements of 6 1 tonne cars......
but depends on ground conditions
Your looking at half that depth of stone...150mm will be enough to take the movements of 6 1 tonne cars......
but depends on ground conditions
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:28 pm
- Location: Preston, Lancashire
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Somerset
- Contact:
50-75mm of limestone chippings is waaaaayy too thick, 40-50max otherwise it will just rut at the first trafficking.
Suggest leave a bag of chipping with the customer for top-up purposes, never had much luck with gravel driveways, people expect too much from them.
Suggest leave a bag of chipping with the customer for top-up purposes, never had much luck with gravel driveways, people expect too much from them.
RW Gale Ltd - Civils & Surfacing Contractors based in Somerset
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:32 am
- Location: Manchester
Thanks for all your responses, reckon 150mm type 1 plus 50mm (20mm) limestone chippings is the way to go then, would there be any benefit in putting a geotextile membrane beneath the chippings and above the sub-base to prevent one from mixing in the other, this has been suggested but I'm not sure about it, i'd be more inclined to put some terram under the sub-base to guard against any loss of fines in the base or sub-grade getting into the base. How about putting a sand blinding layer atop the sub-base?
Based in Manchester
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:32 am
- Location: Manchester
Thanks for all your responses, reckon 150mm type 1 plus 50mm (20mm) limestone chippings is the way to go then, would there be any benefit in putting a geotextile membrane beneath the chippings and above the sub-base to prevent one from mixing in the other, this has been suggested but I'm not sure about it, i'd be more inclined to put some terram under the sub-base to guard against any loss of fines in the base or sub-grade getting into the base. How about putting a sand blinding layer atop the sub-base?
Based in Manchester
-
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:05 pm
- Location: Edinburgh
Put it below sub base. Geotextile membrane faq
-
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:28 pm
- Location: Preston, Lancashire