The website's step-by-step shows Jointing then Compaction, then on another page explains it best to do it the other way round. I'm a bit confused to which way round to do it.
Shall we have a vote?
Jointing & compaction. - Which way round?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:57 pm
- Location: ireland
1) option. Sand it and than compact it. Disadvantage is that once bricks sanded, they woun`t compat as well and some minor uneven brick migth. Simply say, they dond compact as good. Advantage is that area will not loose straight lines. (patern will be as you did it with no changes.)
2) option. Compact and than sand it. Disatvantage that patern lines might swivel slightly. And if wacker plate is really heavy you might do some other damage to brick itself. Advantage, that area will be better compacted.
I do 80% nr1. option, and only when bricks layed on send and cement base or with machine lay I use nr2 option. So for patio, I vote for sand it, than compact it.
2) option. Compact and than sand it. Disatvantage that patern lines might swivel slightly. And if wacker plate is really heavy you might do some other damage to brick itself. Advantage, that area will be better compacted.
I do 80% nr1. option, and only when bricks layed on send and cement base or with machine lay I use nr2 option. So for patio, I vote for sand it, than compact it.