Problem with Patio contractor
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:09 pm
We chose a Marshalls approved contractor to do our patio because we liked the idea of the 10 year warantee.
The contractor arrived and dug out on day 1.
The next day while we were at work he laid the mowing strip around our circular garden. The left half of the circle was near perfect but the right hand half had quite a few straights in it. After speaking with the landscaper he agreed to redo the work the next day.
When we arrived home from work we were very happy that the circle was now complete to our satisfaction.
The landscaper layed the slabs yesterday in a dutch pattern and when my hubby returned home from work he wasn't very happy.
The gaps between the slabs were not even. Some gaps were twice the width of others (some were none existent). Also a few of the slabs were not level so we would probably get puddles whenever it rained, or trip over them.
After having an argument with the landscaper because my husband go irate it was decided that Marshalls would come along and inspect his work. We are now left with the patio unpointed. Will this be ok in this condition for a while?
How easy would it be to lift the offending slabs and move them. Would we have to dig out the mortar and start all over again?
Its a shame the contractor can't just adjust the slabs that are causing a problem without getting Marshalls involved.
The contractor arrived and dug out on day 1.
The next day while we were at work he laid the mowing strip around our circular garden. The left half of the circle was near perfect but the right hand half had quite a few straights in it. After speaking with the landscaper he agreed to redo the work the next day.
When we arrived home from work we were very happy that the circle was now complete to our satisfaction.
The landscaper layed the slabs yesterday in a dutch pattern and when my hubby returned home from work he wasn't very happy.
The gaps between the slabs were not even. Some gaps were twice the width of others (some were none existent). Also a few of the slabs were not level so we would probably get puddles whenever it rained, or trip over them.
After having an argument with the landscaper because my husband go irate it was decided that Marshalls would come along and inspect his work. We are now left with the patio unpointed. Will this be ok in this condition for a while?
How easy would it be to lift the offending slabs and move them. Would we have to dig out the mortar and start all over again?
Its a shame the contractor can't just adjust the slabs that are causing a problem without getting Marshalls involved.
Leaving the flags unpointed for a while won't do any real harm, and the already laid flags should come up relatively easily, if that's what required. However, the 'mortar' on which they were laid will have to be binned: it can't be re-used.
Marshalls should have told you this, and not left it to me to do their 'mopping up'.
Marshalls should have told you this, and not left it to me to do their 'mopping up'.
If you 'interfere' with the work in any way before Marshalls get around to taking a look, you invalidate any claim you might make. Don't be tempted to do the pointing yourselves, or to lift and re-lay any of the flags.
I have severe reservations about these "Approved Contractor" schemes, and the feedback I've had from private clients suggests that many feel Marshalls side with the contractor in most cases. Admittedly, there are some cases where the client reports the Contractor was made to correct faulty work, but these form the minority of the cases I get to hear about.
"Unrealistic expectations" is a phrase that seems to be used when quality of workmanship is in dispute. Several clients have reported this phrase, after being told by whoever that their assumption that, by paying top dollar for a proper job, they were somehow guaranteed a professional standard of work, is "unrealistic" and that what they have ended up with is "satisfactory".
I'd be interested to hear how you get on.
I have severe reservations about these "Approved Contractor" schemes, and the feedback I've had from private clients suggests that many feel Marshalls side with the contractor in most cases. Admittedly, there are some cases where the client reports the Contractor was made to correct faulty work, but these form the minority of the cases I get to hear about.
"Unrealistic expectations" is a phrase that seems to be used when quality of workmanship is in dispute. Several clients have reported this phrase, after being told by whoever that their assumption that, by paying top dollar for a proper job, they were somehow guaranteed a professional standard of work, is "unrealistic" and that what they have ended up with is "satisfactory".
I'd be interested to hear how you get on.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 12:09 pm
Possibly - the only people able to answer this properly are the Marshalls crowd. Their decision is not binding, but if it's as bad as you say, then I can't see them trying to wriggle out of it.
However, if you're not happy, don't pay - that should encourage the contractor to seek a quicker resolution.
However, if you're not happy, don't pay - that should encourage the contractor to seek a quicker resolution.
-
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 4:24 pm
- Location: Derbyshire
- Contact: