Been to look at a job tonight and they wanted a 20 sq metre extension to their already block paved drive (at the side). The drive slopes to the house and all the water at present goes into the drains.
So trying to do things right as I like to do I told the potential client about the new regs and that he would have to apply for planning permission needless to say he said thanks but no thanks sorry to waste my time.
My query is would you all have done the same in telling him or thrown caution to the wind and just done the job in the usual way before the new regs.
I am totally frustrated by it all because everyone I have been to see and told about the new regs has never got back in touch and the ones I have been passed since have not had any work done either.
It is hard enough getting the work at the moment with out this STUMBLING block.
Sorry for going on but it is really pi@*ing me of .
Block drive work - New regs?
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 8:34 pm
- Location: Widnes
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1328
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:00 am
- Location: Warwickshire
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:06 pm
- Location: romford, essex
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
look here
reading this i dont think he needed planning
LLL
reading this i dont think he needed planning
LLL
-
- Posts: 884
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
- Location: Reading
Just got back to base after going to Reading for materials. On the main road, bloody Broadway Paving (they of the mass marketing and continued false claims of Interlay membership) with yet another new CBP driveway draining straight onto the pavement, no provision at all to comply.
My approach is to only offer compliant driveways but I don't talk about the planning element. I figure that in the highly unlikely event of a challenge that retrospective planning would be granted.
I'm not doing permeable paving as yet. If I was, I think I'd have to go the whole hog with customers.
My approach is to only offer compliant driveways but I don't talk about the planning element. I figure that in the highly unlikely event of a challenge that retrospective planning would be granted.
I'm not doing permeable paving as yet. If I was, I think I'd have to go the whole hog with customers.
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:01 am
- Location: London
Injured, if I were you I would change my approach.
A contractor I know uses it as a benefit, in other words he brings up the new regs (in very simple terms) and says that his company will check if PP is required and if so they will submit all relevant paperwork and pay the PP fee.
He has not lost a single sale so far and in fact has picked up a job where people had changed their minds after seeing people before him who had said that PP was required.
Good Luck,
WOP
A contractor I know uses it as a benefit, in other words he brings up the new regs (in very simple terms) and says that his company will check if PP is required and if so they will submit all relevant paperwork and pay the PP fee.
He has not lost a single sale so far and in fact has picked up a job where people had changed their minds after seeing people before him who had said that PP was required.
Good Luck,
WOP
Organiser of the industry event, World of Paving