Laying block paving on shingle

All forms of block paving, brick paving, flexible or rigid, concrete or clays, new construction or renovation
Post Reply
hurdy gurdy
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: witney, oxon

Post: # 28489Post hurdy gurdy

I have been told by the person that came to quote for laying block paving, that he will lay the blocks on a shingle base instead of sand. Is this possible? The shingle would be laid onto a sub base suitable for parking.

Thanks in advance
Paul

Rich H
Posts: 884
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
Location: Reading

Post: # 28495Post Rich H

Absolutely not. No one in their right mind would even think of such a thing. Throw his quote in the bin.

seanandruby
Site Admin
Posts: 4713
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
Location: eastbourne

Post: # 28501Post seanandruby

:laugh: :laugh:
sean

hurdy gurdy
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: witney, oxon

Post: # 28502Post hurdy gurdy

Thanks Rich H
This was my feeling as well. Just wanted to clarify it.

Cheers
Paul

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 28505Post lutonlagerlout

wait a sec guys?
are you sure hes not talking about permeable paving?
AFAIK permeable paving is laid on shingle,but the blocks have 10 mm spacers rather tha 2mm
if its regular paving he is talking rubbish
LLL
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

seanandruby
Site Admin
Posts: 4713
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
Location: eastbourne

Post: # 28510Post seanandruby

........Then would'nt they be on no fines concrete?
sean

Rich H
Posts: 884
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
Location: Reading

Post: # 28511Post Rich H

.........and the sub-base would be different

hurdy gurdy
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: witney, oxon

Post: # 28516Post hurdy gurdy

lutonlagerlout
Thanks for your reply.
No this is standard block paving (Brindle) not permeable. (although he mentions about drainage through the gaps between the blocks). The sub base is to be type 1 mot. I will speak to him to explain what he means by shingle. i had asked him if he means sharp sand and he said no.

regards
Paul

seanandruby
Site Admin
Posts: 4713
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
Location: eastbourne

Post: # 28519Post seanandruby

......it will be no fines grit he will be using
sean

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 28524Post lutonlagerlout

i seem to remeber a thread a while back where people were using recycled crushed glass as a bedding layer
but i think the gaffer said stick to the tried and trusted method I.E. grit sand,flooring sand whatever you call it
LLL
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

seanandruby
Site Admin
Posts: 4713
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
Location: eastbourne

Post: # 28526Post seanandruby

on the permeable pathing index he recommends 2-6ml grit with the blocks spaced well apart then filled with same. Shingle just did'nt seem ideal.
sean

Rich H
Posts: 884
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:28 pm
Location: Reading

Post: # 28530Post Rich H

hurdy gurdy wrote:lutonlagerlout
Thanks for your reply.
No this is standard block paving (Brindle) not permeable. (although he mentions about drainage through the gaps between the blocks). The sub base is to be type 1 mot. I will speak to him to explain what he means by shingle. i had asked him if he means sharp sand and he said no.

regards
Paul
'Drainage through the blocks' is setting off little alarms in my head! Water will very gradually seep through the joints but this is no method of drainage. The paving should be designed such that all rainfall is carried OFF the paving.

I have done many drainage retrofits to pikey block paving where the 'contractor' told the client that the water would 'drain through the blocks'.

hurdy gurdy
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: witney, oxon

Post: # 28557Post hurdy gurdy

Still havn't spoken to the chap yet. I will let you know as soon as.

Tony McC
Site Admin
Posts: 8346
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
Contact:

Post: # 28670Post Tony McC

Shingle is NOT suitable as a laying course for either conventional or permeable paving, The twonk wanting to lay this way should go back to driving his taxi and leave the paving to those with genuine skills.

Time and time again I come across prix who have some revolutionary laying method. "Oh, we use such-and-such...."

Why? We've 30 years of experience using flexible block paving in this country as of this year. Over those three decades, we've gradually refined the laying advice in the light of experience and extensive research: the 2005 update saw the recommended laying course depth reduced from 35-50mm to 25-40mm because it had been shown that a slightly thinner laying course resulted in less settlement. This is research prompted by experience on site and then validated by extensive professional and accredited testing at dedicated research facilities. The result of all this is that we have, in Britain, probably the best laying advice of any nation.

So why do these semi-literate brain donors think they have a system that is better than that which has been developed over 30 years? Pillocks!

I encountered such a crew about 18 months ago. Their infallible laying method eliminated the laying course: they told the homeowner that they'd found this was a better method and that all the top paving companies in the south of England were now laying in this way, and it was only just catching-on in the north - wasn't he lucky he'd employed a gang as professional as themselves?

The truth was they'd forgot to order any bloody sand!
Site Agent - Pavingexpert

lutonlagerlout
Site Admin
Posts: 15184
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
Location: bedfordshire

Post: # 28703Post lutonlagerlout

the last drive we did was 80 M and we used 4 tonnes of grit sand
this gave a depth of about 30mm,years ago when we started doing them the advice was to use road formers and scaffold poles as screed bars,we would have used 8 tonnes of sand,even though the blocks were 90 mm this was way too much sand,although the thickness of the blocks helped
laying 50mm blocks on 50 mm of sand just doesnt seem right at all
cheers LLL
"what,you want paying today??"

YOUR TEXT GOES HERE

Post Reply