Pva mix used with block paving
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:24 pm
- Location: East Midlands
The town where I live is having some extensive paving works being carried out. Walking past an area of pavement where block paving was being laid, I noticed one of the lads dipping the bottom part of the block into a bucket of what looked like a diluted PVA mix and then placing it onto the screeded bed.
Just curious if anyone has heard of this before and what benefit it would be?
Cheers
Just curious if anyone has heard of this before and what benefit it would be?
Cheers
hondacrm
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: darwen
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 3:11 pm
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
PVA with cement will help increase the bond strength. But as PVA is mositure sensitive its efffectiveness will eventually be lost.
Better to use 1:1 Ronafix with cement, more durable.
Better to use 1:1 Ronafix with cement, more durable.
Simeon Osen
Ronacrete Ltd - http://www.ronacrete.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 1279 638 700
Follow us at http://www.twitter.com/Ronacrete
Ronacrete Ltd - http://www.ronacrete.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 1279 638 700
Follow us at http://www.twitter.com/Ronacrete
-
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:20 pm
- Location: darwen
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact:
There's a spec doing the rounds at the moment, largely derived from BS7533, whereby the underside of a paving unit is painted with PVA or similar to ...
1 - increase bond strength between paving and laying course
2 - prevent groundwater wicking to the surface of the paving unit
This is seen most commonly with granite flagstones, and I am still not convinced of its long-term efficacy.
Regarding bond strength: if the laying course is an hydraulically bound material (what we used to call mortar before the bureaucrats took over the building trade), then any additives deemed necessary can be added to the mix, rather than relying on the contractor to haphazardly daub the underside of each individual unit. The concern regarding a dry (and possibly dusty) underside coming into contact with a wet mortar...ooops! a wet hydraulically bound material, can be countered by inverting the units prior to laying and hosing down the lot in one, simple 2 minute operation.
Regarding the water wicking issue: as Simeon pointed out, PVA is water sensitive so its usefulness fizzles out over time. However, it does work for the first 12-24 months, and as this is now the standard retention/defects period, the practice is being adopted to ensure that no wicking problems become evident during that period so that the contractor can reclaim the retention sum with no problems. If wicking then starts to occur, who gives a toss/ The contractor has got his few quid and the client has no lever to force remedial work.
However, just why PVA (or similar) should be applied to the underside of concrete block paving laid onto an unbound (sand) laying course is completely beyond me. Sounds like the sort of knobhead idea that a halfwit architect/designer comes up with after reading about the above and failing to grasp the fact that it only has any validity when working with hydraulically bound laying courses.
1 - increase bond strength between paving and laying course
2 - prevent groundwater wicking to the surface of the paving unit
This is seen most commonly with granite flagstones, and I am still not convinced of its long-term efficacy.
Regarding bond strength: if the laying course is an hydraulically bound material (what we used to call mortar before the bureaucrats took over the building trade), then any additives deemed necessary can be added to the mix, rather than relying on the contractor to haphazardly daub the underside of each individual unit. The concern regarding a dry (and possibly dusty) underside coming into contact with a wet mortar...ooops! a wet hydraulically bound material, can be countered by inverting the units prior to laying and hosing down the lot in one, simple 2 minute operation.
Regarding the water wicking issue: as Simeon pointed out, PVA is water sensitive so its usefulness fizzles out over time. However, it does work for the first 12-24 months, and as this is now the standard retention/defects period, the practice is being adopted to ensure that no wicking problems become evident during that period so that the contractor can reclaim the retention sum with no problems. If wicking then starts to occur, who gives a toss/ The contractor has got his few quid and the client has no lever to force remedial work.
However, just why PVA (or similar) should be applied to the underside of concrete block paving laid onto an unbound (sand) laying course is completely beyond me. Sounds like the sort of knobhead idea that a halfwit architect/designer comes up with after reading about the above and failing to grasp the fact that it only has any validity when working with hydraulically bound laying courses.
Site Agent - Pavingexpert
-
- Posts: 1405
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:29 am
- Location: South Wales
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Somerset
- Contact:
Depends how much ale he's drunk!!!matt h wrote:aren't they always:D
RW Gale Ltd - Civils & Surfacing Contractors based in Somerset
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
See what we get up to Our Facebook page