Concrete
-
bodgeitandscarper
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 9:23 pm
- Location: Hereford
-
matt h
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 11:14 pm
- Location: gosport
stand firm and mdont walk mawayn from this . these buggers count non you not doin it. He is liable , and all your costs are reclaimabke in court action. THREATEN TO GO NATIONAL AND SEE WHAT HE SAYS, NAME AND SHAME ON THIS SITE ,AND CONTACT TRADING STANDARDS. HATE THESE WAnk.....
general builder, maintenance engineer, gas and plumbing installations, extensions etc
-
Wilson
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:38 am
- Location: Basingstoke
Trading Standards are generally advisory. If the concensus is that the supplier has failed in his contractural obligations , implied or in writing...supplied inferior product..or whatever the case may be then County Court is a piece of cake. Its informal and is really not that onerous. They are designed for "Joe Public" but I would think you will need some sort of technical documentary evidence to support your claim as has already been mentioned. It would help if you have correspondence with him , of any form, stating what he proposed and what his reaction was when you asked him to rectify the problem. He probably won't turn up but if he does and the evidence says the concrete is faulty it will cost him....or he will offer to settle before that and put it right.
He puts the good guys to shame and thats why people get agitated. It hard enough to get a reputation in business without idiots like this. Its easy to give advice by the same token and the call has to be yours of course.
He puts the good guys to shame and thats why people get agitated. It hard enough to get a reputation in business without idiots like this. Its easy to give advice by the same token and the call has to be yours of course.
-
Wilson
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:38 am
- Location: Basingstoke
Trading Standards are generally advisory. If the concensus is that the supplier has failed in his contractural obligations , implied or in writing...supplied inferior product..or whatever the case may be then County Court is a piece of cake. Its informal and is really not that onerous. They are designed for "Joe Public" but I would think you will need some sort of technical documentary evidence to support your claim as has already been mentioned. It would help if you have correspondence with him , of any form, stating what he proposed and what his reaction was when you asked him to rectify the problem. He probably won't turn up but if he does and the evidence says the concrete is faulty it will cost him....or he will offer to settle before that and put it right.
He puts the good guys to shame and thats why people get agitated. It hard enough to get a good reputation in business without idiots like this. Its easy to give advice by the same token and the call has to be yours of course.
He puts the good guys to shame and thats why people get agitated. It hard enough to get a good reputation in business without idiots like this. Its easy to give advice by the same token and the call has to be yours of course.