Riding arena - Sub base
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:56 pm
- Location: Wiltshire, UK
Constructng an arena - removing thin layer of topsoil to get down to good quality chalk - the arena surface will be wood fibre - the question is: what type of stone to put down in between the chalk and the wood fibre in order to form a good solid base which will take the pounding of horses' hooves and at the same time allow water to drain through. I thought limestone type 1 would be OK, but my aggregates supplier says this will form a seal and prevent percolation of water through. Is he correct? They suggest limestone 40mm will drain well but I am worried this won't be strong and firm enough. Please advise!
Ed
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Somerset
- Contact:
I was gonna say the same. Type 1 will be fine IMO.
RW Gale Ltd - Civils & Surfacing Contractors based in Somerset
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:57 pm
- Location: Buckinghamshire
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
-
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:24 pm
- Location: Bournemouth, Dorset
this is out on a limb for DIY'er but I have been told that you can by a Type 1 with reduced fines "for better drainage", this did come from a someone who/uses and orders this material for the construction of sports grounds, as Type one is only a crushed base material (limestone/concrete) and sieve settings I could believe a slight change to the sieve settings could produce Type 1 which has less fines filling the voids after the larger pieces interlocked to give the strength.
Like an orthopedic shoe wearer I am willing to stand corrected.
Like an orthopedic shoe wearer I am willing to stand corrected.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:47 pm
- Location: c/o The Black Pig, Staple, Kent
you are not wrong mikey, the big quarrying & civ engineering firm down here gallagher sells a crushed type 1 which has exactly that, less fines. I have seen it used for sites where ground water has been a problem. It meeets the type 1 spec (31.5mm to dust) but has reduced fines, which prevents it going too much like mud
New and improved...Mk. II...10% simpler...still called Simon!
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact:
You can't have a Type 1 with "less fines". The proportion of fines is governed by the grading envelope for Type 1 specification. If you reduce the fines content, it's no longer a Type 1: it's more likely to be a Type 3.
It's akin to saying you can get a diesel with less light aromatic hydrocarbons: you can get a fuel with less light hydrocrabons, but it won't be diesel - it'll probably be petrol! So: you can get an aggregate with less fines, but it won't be a Type 1.
It's akin to saying you can get a diesel with less light aromatic hydrocarbons: you can get a fuel with less light hydrocrabons, but it won't be diesel - it'll probably be petrol! So: you can get an aggregate with less fines, but it won't be a Type 1.
Site Agent - Pavingexpert
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire