Help with patio design - Please, someone give me their opinion!
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:31 pm
- Location: Dorset
REPEAT OF RECENT MESSAGE -REALLY NEED TO MAKE A DECISION SOON -PLEASE HELP!
Hello, I could really do with some feedback on my patio ideas. The patio which will be outside my new conservatory. The size is 2.7 by 6 m. My house is a small cottage, white rendered, a slate roof, paths are Purbeck stone crazy paving style. I am trying to achieve a cottagey, informal look.
I have found some tumbled Indian limestone which matches quite well, but in order to get the colours I want I am restricted to two sizes - 275mm x 275mm and 275mm x 560mm - (I have found a very helpful supplier who'll let me sort through the crates, but only has these two sizes available for this).
I have drawn up a plan laying them as randomly as possible, using predominately the larger size. I'm planning to butt them up against each other - no mortar. BUT I am a little worried that the slabs are too small and might look a bit busy. What do you think?!
I have also considered brick pavers or cobbles, as a complete contrast. By the way I have looked at Purbeck, but new is still to be quarried and I don't have time to wait and reclaimed is extortionate! Sorry this is such a long first post. I am going round and round in circles and would really appreciate your opinions -whatever they are!
Thank you very much
Hello, I could really do with some feedback on my patio ideas. The patio which will be outside my new conservatory. The size is 2.7 by 6 m. My house is a small cottage, white rendered, a slate roof, paths are Purbeck stone crazy paving style. I am trying to achieve a cottagey, informal look.
I have found some tumbled Indian limestone which matches quite well, but in order to get the colours I want I am restricted to two sizes - 275mm x 275mm and 275mm x 560mm - (I have found a very helpful supplier who'll let me sort through the crates, but only has these two sizes available for this).
I have drawn up a plan laying them as randomly as possible, using predominately the larger size. I'm planning to butt them up against each other - no mortar. BUT I am a little worried that the slabs are too small and might look a bit busy. What do you think?!
I have also considered brick pavers or cobbles, as a complete contrast. By the way I have looked at Purbeck, but new is still to be quarried and I don't have time to wait and reclaimed is extortionate! Sorry this is such a long first post. I am going round and round in circles and would really appreciate your opinions -whatever they are!
Thank you very much
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:20 am
- Location: bedfordshire
hi there wren here,the reson no one replied is that you are asking for subjective information
there is no yes/no black /white
to your query
but in the interests of helpfulness i will give my tuppenceworth
1 you get what you pay for: if you buy very cheap the job will look cheap
2 for a cottagy effect ,lay the slabs with say 50mm gaps between them,and fill this with a local decorative gravel
3 the sizes you mention are very small,personally i wouldnt want to lay a patio in these 2 sizes,imo it would look mickey mouse; 560 by 560 and 900 by 560 would look more effective
4 dont forget to dress the patio with lavender, jasmine ,tubs etc.
5 look here for more ideas
hope this helps
LLL
there is no yes/no black /white
to your query
but in the interests of helpfulness i will give my tuppenceworth
1 you get what you pay for: if you buy very cheap the job will look cheap
2 for a cottagy effect ,lay the slabs with say 50mm gaps between them,and fill this with a local decorative gravel
3 the sizes you mention are very small,personally i wouldnt want to lay a patio in these 2 sizes,imo it would look mickey mouse; 560 by 560 and 900 by 560 would look more effective
4 dont forget to dress the patio with lavender, jasmine ,tubs etc.
5 look here for more ideas
hope this helps
LLL
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:31 pm
- Location: Dorset
Dear LLL
Thanks so much for your reply!
Really appreciate your comments. I think you are right about the micky mouse effect - I had this in the back of my mind, but was supressing it!
Am now looking harder at brick pavers, a contrast to the existing purbeck, and will hopefully achieve a more informal look.
Wrenhere
Thanks so much for your reply!
Really appreciate your comments. I think you are right about the micky mouse effect - I had this in the back of my mind, but was supressing it!
Am now looking harder at brick pavers, a contrast to the existing purbeck, and will hopefully achieve a more informal look.
Wrenhere
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact:
Just two sizes of the Injun stone will look awful. It's almost impossible to get a crazy/random look to it with only two sizes and laying them butt-jointed will virtually guarantee problems.
Now: if you were to go for the Injun Sandstone tumbled blocks, rather than flags, that would work much better as they are smaller units and the fact that there are only 3 sizes is less obvious.
Now: if you were to go for the Injun Sandstone tumbled blocks, rather than flags, that would work much better as they are smaller units and the fact that there are only 3 sizes is less obvious.
Site Agent - Pavingexpert
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8346
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 7:27 pm
- Location: Warrington, People's Republic of South Lancashire
- Contact: