Draining a tarmac drive across grass verge - 2 options
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:59 am
- Location: Lincoln
I will be re-laying a drive in the near future. Everything within the property boundary will be gravel, but the council are saying that they own the verge between my gate an the road. Because of this, they say that the drive (5m x 5m) between the gate and the road will need to be 'highway spec' and the work carried out by an appropriate contractor (appropriate public liability insurance etc). As its not something i can do myself, i need to get people to quote for it, and want to get a firm idea of what i'm asking for.
I'm happy with the tarmac requirement, but with regards to drainage, i'm wondering if i have any options.
My initial plan was to use half-battered pcc kerbs left and right of the drive and channel the water away from the road to a linear drain under the gate. From there, the water would be piped 20m or so to our ditch that runs parallel to the road (we're on heavy clay so a soakaway is a non-starter).
However, in order to save on the drainage cost, i was wondering if it was possible to use flat top pcc edging to retain the tarmac and build a camber into the tarmac so the water goes left and right, over the flat top, into flower beds that run alongside the tarmac. Is this possible, is it practical, will it be suitable?
Cheers
I'm happy with the tarmac requirement, but with regards to drainage, i'm wondering if i have any options.
My initial plan was to use half-battered pcc kerbs left and right of the drive and channel the water away from the road to a linear drain under the gate. From there, the water would be piped 20m or so to our ditch that runs parallel to the road (we're on heavy clay so a soakaway is a non-starter).
However, in order to save on the drainage cost, i was wondering if it was possible to use flat top pcc edging to retain the tarmac and build a camber into the tarmac so the water goes left and right, over the flat top, into flower beds that run alongside the tarmac. Is this possible, is it practical, will it be suitable?
Cheers
Thanks for the help.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:59 am
- Location: Lincoln
Many thanks for the links, not sure how i missed those.
The infiltration drain looks promising.
I understand that generally the tarmac should slope away from the road, but if i have a infiltration drain either side of the tarmac, would it be acceptable to keep it level (front to back) in order to channel the water to the sides?
The infiltration drain looks promising.
I understand that generally the tarmac should slope away from the road, but if i have a infiltration drain either side of the tarmac, would it be acceptable to keep it level (front to back) in order to channel the water to the sides?
Thanks for the help.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:59 am
- Location: Lincoln
Not sure it'll help much, but below is a pic. As you can see, very much a blank canvas!
The temporary gate is being replaced with brick piers and a timber field gate. Between the brick piers will be some setts to retain the gravel.
It is between these brick piers that any linear channel will sit. I have plenty of space to play with levels, so i am free to set the the base of the brick piers (and therefore the tarmac) to pretty much any height.
My question relates to whether i can send the water left and right as you look at the pic, instead of channeling it from the road to a linear drain beneath the gate.
The temporary gate is being replaced with brick piers and a timber field gate. Between the brick piers will be some setts to retain the gravel.
It is between these brick piers that any linear channel will sit. I have plenty of space to play with levels, so i am free to set the the base of the brick piers (and therefore the tarmac) to pretty much any height.
My question relates to whether i can send the water left and right as you look at the pic, instead of channeling it from the road to a linear drain beneath the gate.
Thanks for the help.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Somerset
- Contact:
Chuck it to the verges, no problem
RW Gale Ltd - Civils & Surfacing Contractors based in Somerset
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
See what we get up to Our Facebook page
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:59 am
- Location: Lincoln
Apologies for the delayed reply. Just a quick update:
I've just received the written spec from the council reference constructing this tarmac drive. I may be missing something, but the spec seems to indicate that a 1:25 fall TOWARDS to road is required.
This isn't a problem for me, but it seems strange that i'll be sending water towards the road rather than into drainage. Additionally, the future gravel drive (on the house side of the gate) is currently naturally lower than the road. Sending the drive towards the road at 1:25 over 6m means i'll need to raise the drive by 240mm at the gateway.
Can anyone confirm a fall towards the road is standard and that i should just crack on as per the spec?
I've just received the written spec from the council reference constructing this tarmac drive. I may be missing something, but the spec seems to indicate that a 1:25 fall TOWARDS to road is required.
This isn't a problem for me, but it seems strange that i'll be sending water towards the road rather than into drainage. Additionally, the future gravel drive (on the house side of the gate) is currently naturally lower than the road. Sending the drive towards the road at 1:25 over 6m means i'll need to raise the drive by 240mm at the gateway.
Can anyone confirm a fall towards the road is standard and that i should just crack on as per the spec?
Thanks for the help.
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:59 am
- Location: Lincoln
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:59 am
- Location: Lincoln
Thanks seanandruby. Any fall TOWARDS the road will be difficult, given current ground levels. I could achieve a 1:25 fall FROM the road quite easily. The added effort/expense of draining the drive would be worth it to avoid a massive change in ground level.
Do you think reversing the fall be acceptable, providing i deal with the drainage in a suitable way?
Do you think reversing the fall be acceptable, providing i deal with the drainage in a suitable way?
Thanks for the help.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne
A trick i use is place a brick upright on the existing road close to where your dropped kerbs will be. Knock a stake in 2 metres back from that, place a straight edge from the top of brick to your stake raising it 50/60 ml at the stake end and mark it undeside of straight edge, that will give you the required fall.
sean
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4713
- Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:01 am
- Location: eastbourne